[Bug libstdc++/86130] Expect SIGSEGV but program just silently exits

[redi at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86130

--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Paul Sanders from comment #12)
> Any interest?

Good grief, no.

That would generate even worse code than what we have now, and it's possible to
test for badbit without enabling exceptions. You keep making assumptions about
what everyone else's programs do, and we have no way of knowing what the
majority of libstdc++ users expect from this code, or how much code relies on
the current behaviour.