[Bug middle-end/86680] possible gcc optimization

[jakub at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86680

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Yeah.  You probably need something like:
void clear_bss1(void)
{
    unsigned long *bss = __bss_start1;
    asm ("" : "+g" (bss));
    while (bss < __bss_end1)
        *bss++ = 0UL;
}
to hide the UB from the optimizers; pointer arithmetics is only defined within
the same object and similarly pointer comparison other than ==/!=, while the
first function has two different objects.