[Bug target/86448] GCC 9 compiler generates slower code for spec 2006 milc on a power9 using -mcpu=power9 than using -mcpu=power8
kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Tue Jul 24 18:19:00 GMT 2018
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86448
--- Comment #2 from kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Using the GCC8 branch, svn version id 262483 (the same version tested by
Michael), I'm getting the following results:
-mcpu=power8 -mcpu=power9
28.57 28.79
28.41 28.61
28.54 28.21
28.53 28.55
29.02 28.59
28.54 27.34
28.25 26.63
28.56 29.13
delta Percent
average 28.5525 28.23125 0.32125 1.13%
As with my trunk measurements, I'm not seeing a 2% difference. Rnd I am seeing
that targeting power9 produces slightly better performance than targeting
power8.
It may be that we're running with different optimization flags. I used
OPTIMIZE = -Ofast -mcpu=power9 (or -mcpu=power8)
LDOPT = -m64 -Wl,-q -Wl,-rpath=%{BASE_DIR}/lib64
I'm inclined to close this issue unless Michael can point me to a different set
of options to explore...
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list