[Bug fortran/83900] [8 Regression] ICE in gfc_simplify_matmul, at fortran/simplify.c:4593
sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Sat Jan 20 16:51:00 GMT 2018
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83900
--- Comment #10 from Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu> ---
On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 03:22:50PM +0000, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83900
>
> --- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
> The original test in comment 0 still fails at r256917 on darwin with
>
> pr83900.f90:4:0:
>
> print *, matmul(a, b)
>
> internal compiler error: in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2402
>
> Should I reopen this PR or open a new one?
>
Interesting. gfortran.dg/matmul_17.f90 is essentially the
code in comment #0 without the IO statement. The backtrace
in comment #0 is caused by the assert() I removed, which is
bogus. I think a new PR is needed. It seems matmul is
hosed
integer, parameter :: a(3,2) = 1
real, parameter :: b(2,3) = 2
real, parameter :: c(3,3) = matmul(a,b)
real d(3,3)
d = matmul(a,b)
print '(9F5.1)', c
print '(9F5.1)', d
% gfcx -o z -fno-frontend-optimize a.f90
% ./z
4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
-fno-frontend-optimize is not needed to get the above.
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list