[Bug middle-end/83665] [8 regression] Big code size regression and some code quality improvement at Jan 2 2018

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83665

--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Unsure what to do about this bug -- things have gone back a bit but as you say
the cap introduced artificial limit back in times.  But we do have
large-function-growth to limit big_speedup for large functions, no?

There was big size improvement with the big_speedup fuckup and comparing to
before that we only "regressed" for a few cases, like overall size is still
improving.

So is this fixed or do you plan more changes?