[Bug middle-end/82004] [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2017 628.pop2_s miscompare

[wilco at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82004

--- Comment #20 from Wilco <wilco at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #19)
> In any case, having a fast and at least for double precise exp10 in glibc
> would be also beneficial, then this issue would go away at least on glibc
> targets.

Yes, indeed. The key question is how do we know we are linking with GLIBC
(including from Fortran, where there are no headers)?