[Bug tree-optimization/82518] [8 regression] gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/in-pack.f90 fails on armeb since r252917
aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Wed Feb 7 10:26:00 GMT 2018
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82518
--- Comment #37 from Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Christophe Lyon from comment #31)
> Created attachment 43352 [details]
> Reduced testcase
>
> I commented out most calls, since abort() is called from csub4.
Can you also remove the csub8, isub4, and isub8 unused functions as well?
I see you've commented out this in csub4:
!! if (any(bb /= b)) call abort
I assume this is irrelevant to the failure?
Can you also verify that after these changes you have a revision of GCC for
which this reduced testcase succeeds (regardless of the vect cost model rabbit
hole), and a revision of GCC for which this fails?
I'm trying to make sure all this removing of stuff didn't cause an
inconditional abort.
Also, is this only reproducible with -g?
BTW, no need to include the assembly. I should be able to generate it with a
cross ./cc1.
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list