[Bug c++/88320] GCC suggests variables that don't exist yet

[redi at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88320

--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jonny Grant from comment #0)
> Suggestion on line 5 of a variable which is acutally the return value, and
> doesn't exist yet. Better to only suggest alternative as variables that
> exist already in scope?

The variable's scope begins after its name, so it is already in scope.