[Bug target/81084] [8 Regression] powerpcspe port full of confusing configury / command-line options not related to SPE

[ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81084

Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #35 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> A port does not need maintenance only for that port, and its users, but also
> for GCC itself.  All ports are a cost to _all_ GCC developers.  If a port is
> not maintained it has to be removed.

Do you IBM guys have a hidden agenda to bury the left-overs of Freescale? ;-)

The SPE port has already been moved out of the way so I don't really see the
point in further hammering it like that; there are plenty of obsolete ports in
the tree that would have to removed before this one if the above criterion was
followed to the letter.