[Bug tree-optimization/58454] Potentially wrong(or at least weird/inconsistent) code generation with -O2 -fno-strict-overflow

[rguenther at suse dot de]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58454

--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> ---
On September 4, 2017 5:51:13 PM GMT+02:00, "manu at gcc dot gnu.org"
<gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58454
>
>Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
>
>           What    |Removed                     |Added
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>             CC|                            |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
>
>--- Comment #6 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
>Richard, is this bug fixed for GCC 8?
>
>I'd like to update the FAQ:
>https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/FAQ#signed_overflow

Given -fno-strict-overflow is now mapped to -fwrapv you could say so.