[Bug sanitizer/83219] [8 regression] c-c++-common/ubsan/unreachable-2.c fails starting with r255201
rguenther at suse dot de
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Thu Nov 30 09:58:00 GMT 2017
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83219
--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> ---
On Thu, 30 Nov 2017, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83219
>
> --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> Because new __builtin_unreachable calls are added everywhere in the
> optimization pipeline. I'd rather disable the optimizations where we remove
> conditionals or switches that branch to __builtin_unreachable if
> (sanitize_flags_p (SANITIZE_UNREACHABLE)).
> Not sure where exactly that is though. I see:
> /* Discard cases that have an unreachable destination block. */
> if (EDGE_COUNT (base_bb->succs) == 0
> && gimple_seq_unreachable_p (bb_seq (base_bb)))
> {
> edge base_edge = find_edge (gimple_bb (stmt), base_bb);
> if (base_edge != NULL)
> remove_edge_and_dominated_blocks (base_edge);
> i = next_index;
> continue;
> }
> but that is something for switches only, where do we do this for GIMPLE_COND?
See callers of assert_unreachable_fallthru_edge_p ()
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list