[Bug c++/83060] ICE on valid C++ code: in ignore_overflows, at cp/cvt.c:583

[nathan at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83060

--- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell <nathan at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I recall discussion years back that concluded the
  int *p = &a.s[-1];
case was well formed (there being no access specifier between the two fields).

Of course the validity of the argument may have changed with updates to the
std.