[Bug c/44943] Need documentation on the intended semantics of "volatile" (in C)

[msebor at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44943

Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I believe this request was largely resolved in r163400 by moving the C++
documentation of volatile accesses to the C manual.

The additional sentence (underlined in comment #0) wasn't added but to me the
text just before it implies it.  If you'd still like it added please reopen the
bug.