[Bug middle-end/80020] [7 Regression] gcc confused about aligned_alloc argument order

[law at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80020

--- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: law
Date: Tue Mar 14 22:16:27 2017
New Revision: 246145

URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246145&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
        PR middle-end/80020
        * builtin-attrs.def (ATTR_ALLOC_SIZE_2_NOTHROW_LIST): New macro.
        * builtins.def (aligned_alloc): Use it.

        PR middle-end/80020
        * gcc.dg/attr-alloc_size-6.c: Correct aligned_alloc argument order.
        * gcc.dg/attr-alloc_size-7.c: Same.
        * gcc.dg/attr-alloc_size-9.c: Same.
        * gcc.dg/builtin-alloc-size.c: Same.
        * gcc.dg/pr80020.c: New test.

Added:
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr80020.c
Modified:
    trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/builtin-attrs.def
    trunk/gcc/builtins.def
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/attr-alloc_size-6.c
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/attr-alloc_size-7.c
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/attr-alloc_size-9.c
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/builtin-alloc-size.c