[Bug tree-optimization/50824] memset or memcpy on structure prevents SRA

[egallager at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50824

Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|WAITING                     |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID

--- Comment #2 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> No, I think because it counts as address-taken, not because it escapes.
> 
> Do you have a testcase?  Most memcpys should be folded to a plain assignment
> already, but we don't fold memset to zero to = {} I guess.

No testcase provided; closing since it's been in WAITING so long with no
response