[Bug other/78068] warning: implicit declaration of function ‘time’; did you mean ‘nice’? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]

[dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78068

David Malcolm <dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Depends on|                            |69968

--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm <dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I had a go at fixing this by introducing a "require_close_matches" flag to
best_match (When set, it would require an edit distance of 1), and turning it
on for just this warning.

Unfortunately this broke the scanf<->sacnf transposition detection in one of
the testcases.

Maybe this would be a valid approach if we implemented transposition handling
when computing the edit distance.  (transposition-handling is PR 69968).


Referenced Bugs:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69968
[Bug 69968] RFC: Use Damerau-Levenshtein within spellcheck.c, rather than
Levenshtein