[Bug middle-end/78959] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr78622.c

[msebor at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78959

--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Okay, thanks.  I can add that but shouldn't the pass still correctly handle the
pre-C99 HP-UX behavior (i.e., when HAVE_C99_RUNTIME is not defined)?  (In case
it's not apparent from the test, it fails because GCC optimizes calls like
"sprintf(0, 0, "%hhd", 4105)" to 1 when on pre-C99 HP-UX the function returns
4.