[Bug tree-optimization/78394] False positives of maybe-uninitialized with -Og

[egallager at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78394

--- Comment #6 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #5)
> Well, -Og doesn't do any of the detailed analysis and optimization that
> would give the compiler the opportunity to eliminate the paths that result
> in the false positive.  So it's no great surprise.

-O0 doesn't do any of that detailed analysis or optimization either, but it
doesn't have the same issue of warning like -Og