[Bug c++/26426] Type layout bug
egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Thu Aug 17 21:41:00 GMT 2017
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26426
Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed| |2017-08-17
CC| |egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Redoing lost https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2017-08/msg01612.html
Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed| |2017-08-14
CC| |egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
How are you getting the byte values? I compiled the testcase but I don't know
what I'm supposed to be looking for in the output...
$ /usr/local/bin/g++ -Wall -Wextra -Wreorder -Wpacked -Wpadded -c 26426.cc
$ size 26426.o
__TEXT __DATA __OBJC others dec hex
1237 232 0 16 1485 5cd
$ nm 26426.o
0000041c s EH_frame1
0000012c S __ZN1AC2Ev
U __ZN1AD2Ev
00000148 S __ZN1BC2Ev
U __ZN1BD2Ev
00000164 S __ZN1XC2Ev
000001ac S __ZN1XD2Ev
000001f4 S __ZN1YC2Ev
U __ZN1YD2Ev
0000007a T __ZN1ZC1Ev
00000000 T __ZN1ZC2Ev
000002e6 S __ZN1ZD0Ev
00000222 S __ZN1ZD1Ev
0000038c S __ZTC1Z0_1Y
000003a4 S __ZTC1Z4_1X
U __ZTI1A
U __ZTI1B
000003f4 S __ZTI1X
U __ZTI1Y
000003d4 S __ZTI1Z
00000417 S __ZTS1X
00000414 S __ZTS1Z
00000368 S __ZTT1Z
U __ZTV1A
U __ZTV1B
0000032c S __ZTV1Z
U __ZTVN10__cxxabiv121__vmi_class_type_infoE
00000311 S __ZTv0_n12_N1ZD0Ev
000002d4 S __ZTv0_n12_N1ZD1Ev
U __ZdlPvm
00000323 S ___x86.get_pc_thunk.ax
00000327 S ___x86.get_pc_thunk.bx
000005c4 s l__ZTT1Z$non_lazy_ptr
000005c8 s l__ZTV1A$non_lazy_ptr
000005cc s l__ZTV1B$non_lazy_ptr
000005c0 s l__ZTV1Z$non_lazy_ptr
$
--- New Comment ---
Jonathan Wakely also had a comment that got lost in the Bugzilla outage, but my
browser doesn't seem to want to load my email or the archived copy, so he'll
have to re-add it himself... (I think he said something like this wasn't
actually a bug...)
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list