[Bug target/81654] New: Should interrupt attribute be allowed together with naked attribute?
hjl.tools at gmail dot com
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Tue Aug 1 18:58:00 GMT 2017
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81654
Bug ID: 81654
Summary: Should interrupt attribute be allowed together with
naked attribute?
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: hjl.tools at gmail dot com
CC: ubizjak at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
[hjl@gnu-6 naked-1]$ cat x.c
/* { dg-do run { target i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* } } */
/* { dg-options "-mgeneral-regs-only" } */
extern void exit (int);
typedef unsigned int uword_t __attribute__ ((mode (__word__)));
#define ERROR 0x12345670
#define IP 0x12345671
#define CS 0x12345672
#define FLAGS 0x12345673
#define SP 0x12345674
#define SS 0x12345675
#define STRING(x) XSTRING(x)
#define XSTRING(x) #x
#define ASMNAME(cname) ASMNAME2 (__USER_LABEL_PREFIX__, cname)
#define ASMNAME2(prefix, cname) XSTRING (prefix) cname
struct interrupt_frame
{
uword_t ip;
uword_t cs;
uword_t flags;
uword_t sp;
uword_t ss;
};
__attribute__((interrupt, naked, used))
void
fn (struct interrupt_frame *frame, uword_t error)
{
if (ERROR != error)
__builtin_abort ();
if (IP != frame->ip)
__builtin_abort ();
if (CS != frame->cs)
__builtin_abort ();
if (FLAGS != frame->flags)
__builtin_abort ();
if (SP != frame->sp)
__builtin_abort ();
if (SS != frame->ss)
__builtin_abort ();
exit (0);
}
int
main ()
{
asm ("push $" STRING (SS) "; \
push $" STRING (SP) "; \
push $" STRING (FLAGS) "; \
push $" STRING (CS) "; \
push $" STRING (IP) "; \
push $" STRING (ERROR) "; \
jmp " ASMNAME ("fn"));
return 0;
}
[hjl@gnu-6 naked-1]$ make
/export/build/gnu/gcc/build-x86_64-linux/gcc/xgcc
-B/export/build/gnu/gcc/build-x86_64-linux/gcc/ -O2 -mgeneral-regs-only -c -o
x.o x.c
/export/build/gnu/gcc/build-x86_64-linux/gcc/xgcc
-B/export/build/gnu/gcc/build-x86_64-linux/gcc/ x.o -o x
./x
make: *** [Makefile:12: all] Segmentation fault
[hjl@gnu-6 naked-1]$
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list