[Bug fortran/78033] Internal Compiler Error in enforce_single_undo_checkpoint
sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Sat Oct 22 15:25:00 GMT 2016
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78033
--- Comment #11 from Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu> ---
On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 12:19:36PM +0000, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78033
>
> --- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
> > The patch regtested fine but for
> >
> > FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/udr3.f90 -O (test for errors, line 16)
> > FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/udr3.f90 -O (test for excess errors)
>
> I have overlooked another failure
>
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_constructor_42.f90 -O (test for excess errors)
>
> /opt/gcc/work/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/array_constructor_42.f90:15:24:
>
> vec = (/ real(a = 1), 1. /)
> 1
> Error: Invalid type-spec at (1)
> /opt/gcc/work/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/array_constructor_42.f90:21:26:
>
> print *,(/ real(a = 1) /)
> 1
> Error: Invalid type-spec at (1)
>
Yeah, I found that one in my final round of regression testing
(ie., clean src/, bootstrap, regression test). What is weird
is that the some of the changes in the version of match.c I have
is not what I remember last writing to disk. Must have hit an
undo edit before saving.
The udr3.f90 failure is mystery at the moment.
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list