[Bug tree-optimization/70317] [6 Regression] folding x<=x to true for large vectors, ignoring nans

[glisse at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70317

--- Comment #6 from Marc Glisse <glisse at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #5)
> Do double and long long always have the same size?

Ah, it doesn't matter since the result of <= is an opaque vector type and can
thus be implicitly cast even to a vector of char if we like.