[Bug c++/69496] [5/6 Regression] [C++ 14] ICE on VLA in constexpr function

[msebor at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69496

Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|ice-on-valid-code           |ice-on-invalid-code

--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Good catch!  The excessive upper bound of the loop was my mistake.  It's ICE on
invalid code then.