[Bug c++/70018] Possible issue around IPO and C++ inline functions

[sanjoy at playingwithpointers dot com]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70018

--- Comment #6 from Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers dot com> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> Oh I see pure/const behavior.
> 
> The problem is more complex, in that in one TU, the comdat function is
> figured out to be pure/const so we remove the store before the function
> call.  While in the other we don't.  Now we got a comdat function which is
> pure in one TU while not in the other case.  We use the non pure version of
> the comdat function.
> 
> I thought this was fixed in 6.

Ah, okay.  I'm testing with 5.3.  If this is fixed in gcc 6, please feel free
to close.