[Bug tree-optimization/69908] recognizing idioms that check for a buffer of all-zeros could make *much* better code
manu at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Tue Feb 23 00:21:00 GMT 2016
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69908
Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
There is a lot of work still to do in the vectorizer. Perhaps some of your
suggestions are already in this list:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?keywords=missed-optimization,%20&keywords_type=allwords&list_id=7719&short_desc=vectori%20SLP&cf_known_to_fail_type=allwords&cf_known_to_work_type=allwords&query_format=advanced&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=SUSPENDED&bug_status=WAITING&bug_status=REOPENED&short_desc_type=anywordssubstr&component=tree-optimization&product=gcc
Problems are more likely to be fixed if they are 1) minimally described 2)
causes are identified 3) possible solutions are proposed.
Looking at what GCC is doing internally
(https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Developer-Options.html) may help to
pin-point causes.
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list