[Bug target/67714] [6 Regression] signed char is zero-extended instead of sign-extended
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Wed Feb 3 08:41:00 GMT 2016
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67714
--- Comment #12 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #11)
> Hi Kyrill,
>
> > For this failure (among others) I proposed the series at:
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-01/msg01713.html
>
> Ah - much better! I have approved the parts of your series that I can, In
> fact you should have enough approval now to check in everything except the
> new test.
>
> Cheers
> Nick
>
> PS. For the record my patch had one regression:
> c-c++-common/torture/pr61184.c when compiled with -mthumb and -Os.
Thanks!
As I mentioned in the cover letter for the series it is based on a patch by Jim
Wilson posted at:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-06/msg02132.html
So I'd like approval for the arm.h hunk of that as well before committing the
series if possible
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list