[Bug tree-optimization/69615] 0 to limit signed range checks don't always use unsigned compare

jakub at gcc dot gnu.org gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Tue Feb 2 11:16:00 GMT 2016


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69615

--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I suppose even that is doable in the reassoc framework, or it could be done in
match.pd just using the recorded value ranges, like richi has handled PR69595,
or both.


More information about the Gcc-bugs mailing list