[Bug c/69602] [6 Regression] over-ambitious logical-op warning on EAGAIN vs EWOULDBLOCK

[manu at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69602

Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |manu at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #2 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #1)
> Confirmed, though there are other PRs similar in nature.  Fixing this isn't
> trivial at all.  E.g. -Wduplicated-cond has the same problem -- that's the
> reason these warnings aren't enabled by -Wall/-Wextra. :(

It isn't trivial, but it may be possible now by seeing that the operators come
from the expansion of different macros, no?