[Bug tree-optimization/69580] [6 Regression] From 26 seconds to 10 minutes moving from gcc 5.3.1 to gcc 6.0.0
law at redhat dot com
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Mon Feb 1 20:54:00 GMT 2016
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69580
--- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> ---
If you could pass it along to me privately, I can verify if it's the same issue
or not easily (that's the nice things about a PARAM, I can just crank up the
limiter and see what happens). I also happen to have gcc-4.9 and gcc-5
compilers handy to compare against.
law@redhat.com
Thanks for taking the time to dig this stuff out and report the issues. We're
using the FSM bits a lot more now and plan to rely on them more in the future.
So shaking out these cases is important.
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list