[Bug middle-end/73550] Another wrong -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning in switch statement

[law at redhat dot com]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=73550

Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |law at redhat dot com

--- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> ---
The additional asserts aren't going to be particularly helpful here.  This is
the fundamental problem that ASSERT_EXPRs  are not considered new definitions. 
Thus we lose most of the information they carry at merge points.

The fact that the second switch is represented differently hurts here too.