[Bug c/65467] [libgomp] sorry, unimplemented: '_Atomic' with OpenMP

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65467

--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jeff Hammond from comment #3)
> Do you seriously pick this one time to prevent the user from even trying to
> write incorrect code, while allowing an uncountable number of others?

This is different because the semantics are not defined at all.

> 
> One of the motivations for writing code that mixes C11 and OpenMP is because
> I am a member of the OpenMP working group devoted to supporting C11 and
> C++14 in the OpenMP standard.  By refusing to allow me to experiment with
> OpenMP+C11, you actively harm progress in the OpenMP standard that would
> allow you to resolve the semantic ambiguity that motivated disabling
> C11+OpenMP in the first place.

If you are part of the working group then you should be able to help define the
semantics instead of complaining we disable things :).