[Bug c++/59980] Diagnostics relating to template-specialisations using enums.

[manu at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59980

Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2016-08-18
                 CC|                            |manu at gcc dot gnu.org
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #5 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Clang prints:

prog.cc:19:9: error: no member named 'fn' in 's1<e1::t2>'; did you mean
's1<t1>::fn'?
        s1<t2>::fn();   // Causes an error to be emitted that I'd like to
modify the format of.
        ^~~~~~~~~~
        s1<t1>::fn
prog.cc:8:21: note: 's1<t1>::fn' declared here
        static void fn() {}
                    ^
prog.cc:21:9: error: no member named 'fn' in 's2<e2::t4>'; did you mean
's2<e2::t3>::fn'?
        s2<e2::t4>::fn();       // Causes an error to be emitted that I'd like
to modify the format of.
        ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
        s2<e2::t3>::fn
prog.cc:14:21: note: 's2<e2::t3>::fn' declared here
        static void fn() {}
                    ^

It should be possible to do this in g++ nowadays.