[Bug target/70708] Suboptimal code generated when using _mm_set_sd (X64)

[hjl.tools at gmail dot com]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70708

--- Comment #16 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #15)
> MyMinV2 returns a double, not a __m128d. I tried to read what the ABI says
> about the unused upper part of SSE registers when passing/returning a double
> and couldn't find any information. Could you explain in more details what
> makes MyMinV2 so different from MyMinV1? I appear to be missing some crucial
> piece of information here :-(

I opened PR 70721 for the _mm_min_sd issue.