[Bug middle-end/67442] [5/6 Regression] GCC 5.2.0 on x86_64 creates invalid address on specific array index calculation through pointer

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67442

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
           Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org      |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Testing

@@ -6166,8 +6173,12 @@ extract_muldiv_1 (tree t, tree c, enum t
              && ((sign == UNSIGNED && tcode != MULT_EXPR) || sign == SIGNED))
            overflow_p = true;
          if (!overflow_p)
-           return fold_build2 (tcode, ctype, fold_convert (ctype, op0),
-                               wide_int_to_tree (ctype, mul));
+           {
+             mul = wide_int::from (mul, TYPE_PRECISION (ctype),
+                                   TYPE_SIGN (TREE_TYPE (op1)));
+             return fold_build2 (tcode, ctype, fold_convert (ctype, op0),
+                                 wide_int_to_tree (ctype, mul));
+           }
        }

       /* If these operations "cancel" each other, we have the main