https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67499 --- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Well, clang isn't much better by default: markus@x4 tmp % clang++ -stdlib=libc++ -c foo.cxx 2>&1 | wc -l 97 markus@x4 tmp % clang++ -c foo.cxx 2>&1 | wc -l 88