[Bug target/68483] [5/6 Regression] gcc 5.2: suboptimal code compared to 4.9

[jakub at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68483

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
On i?86 this regressed with r217509, aka part of VEC_RSHIFT_EXPR removal.
Guess we'll need to have a look at the i?86 vec perm handling.