[Bug target/68277] [5/6 Regression] [SH]: error: insn does not satisfy its constraints when compiling erlang

[olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68277

--- Comment #12 from Oleg Endo <olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #10)
> (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #9)
> > At the current (lack of) pace I don't know when all of that will be done. 
> > So my idea was to at least reduce the R0 problem for users by making LRA the
> > default in GCC 6.  If we have to add the 2nd postreload temporarily, so be
> > it.  When the other solutions become more mature and stable, we can remove
> > the 2nd postreload thing again.
> 
> I don't object.  Please go ahead.

OK.  I would like to wait with that a bit though.  I'm still trying to get some
work done on AMS...

(In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #11)
> 
> I've confirmed that there are no new failures with the new patch on
> sh4-unknown-linux-gnu.
> BTW, the ICE for gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-4.c -Os pops up again
> even with the unmodified tree.  So we have no regressions at all.

Great, thanks!  I'll commit it to trunk and GCC 5 branch.