[Bug c++/54835] [C++11][DR 1518] Explicit default constructors not respected during copy-list-initialization

[daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54835

--- Comment #10 from Daniel Krügler <daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com> ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #9)
> I believe that the resolution of DR 1630 clarifies that value-initialization
> can invoke an explicit constructor even in copy-list-initialization context,
> so I should revert my change for this PR.

I read DR 1630 again and cannot follow that conclusion - could you clarify? It
still says "For copy-initialization, the candidate functions are all the
converting constructors (12.3.1 [class.conv.ctor]) of that class" and the issue
example uses an explicit default constructor.