[Bug ipa/65478] [5 regression] crafty performance regression

hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Mon Mar 30 21:40:00 GMT 2015


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65478

--- Comment #19 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Actually at second thought, would BIT_FIELD_REF <arg1_3(D), ...> allow us to
avoid the actual memory store? I tought like COMPONENT_REF it takes address as
parameter. What I am hoping is to fully optimize out union doub x; at early
optimization time.



More information about the Gcc-bugs mailing list