[Bug target/65369] [5 Regression] nettle test failure on powerpc64le-linux-gnu when built with -O3
thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Thu Mar 12 11:11:00 GMT 2015
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65369
--- Comment #12 from Thomas Preud'homme <thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #11)
> 0x0000000010000a00 <+1024>: bl 0x100005b0 <_init+112>
> 0x0000000010000a04 <+1028>: ld r2,24(r1)
> 0x0000000010000a08 <+1032>: lwz r9,224(r1)
> 0x0000000010000a0c <+1036>: addi r3,r1,200
> 0x0000000010000a10 <+1040>: addi r4,r1,380
> 0x0000000010000a14 <+1044>: stw r9,380(r1)
> 0x0000000010000a18 <+1048>: lwz r9,228(r1)
> 0x0000000010000a1c <+1052>: stw r9,384(r1)
> 0x0000000010000a20 <+1056>: lwz r9,232(r1)
> 0x0000000010000a24 <+1060>: stw r9,388(r1)
> 0x0000000010000a28 <+1064>: lwz r9,236(r1)
> 0x0000000010000a2c <+1068>: stw r9,392(r1)
> 0x0000000010000a30 <+1072>: lwz r9,240(r1)
> 0x0000000010000a34 <+1076>: stw r9,396(r1)
> 0x0000000010000a38 <+1080>: lwz r9,244(r1)
> 0x0000000010000a3c <+1084>: stw r9,400(r1)
> 0x0000000010000a40 <+1088>: lwz r9,248(r1)
> 0x0000000010000a44 <+1092>: stw r9,404(r1)
> 0x0000000010000a48 <+1096>: lwz r9,252(r1)
> 0x0000000010000a4c <+1100>: stw r9,408(r1)
> 0x0000000010000a50 <+1104>: lwz r9,256(r1)
> 0x0000000010000a54 <+1108>: stw r9,412(r1)
> 0x0000000010000a58 <+1112>: lwz r9,260(r1)
> 0x0000000010000a5c <+1116>: stw r9,416(r1)
> 0x0000000010000a60 <+1120>: lwz r9,264(r1)
> 0x0000000010000a64 <+1124>: stw r9,420(r1)
> 0x0000000010000a68 <+1128>: lwz r9,268(r1)
> 0x0000000010000a6c <+1132>: stw r9,424(r1)
> 0x0000000010000a70 <+1136>: lwz r9,272(r1)
> 0x0000000010000a74 <+1140>: stw r9,428(r1)
> 0x0000000010000a78 <+1144>: lwz r9,276(r1)
> 0x0000000010000a7c <+1148>: stw r9,432(r1)
> 0x0000000010000a80 <+1152>: lwz r9,280(r1)
> 0x0000000010000a84 <+1156>: stw r9,436(r1)
> 0x0000000010000a88 <+1160>: lwz r9,284(r1)
> 0x0000000010000a8c <+1164>: stw r9,440(r1)
> 0x0000000010000a90 <+1168>: bl 0x10000cb0 <md4_transform>
> 0x0000000010000a94 <+1172>: li r3,0
> 0x0000000010000a98 <+1176>: b 0x10000784 <main+388>
> 0x0000000010000a9c <+1180>: bl 0x100005e0 <_init+160>
> 0x0000000010000aa0 <+1184>: ld r2,24(r1)
> ---Type <return> to continue, or q <return> to quit---
> 0x0000000010000aa4 <+1188>: cmpdi cr7,r3,0
> 0x0000000010000aa8 <+1192>: beq cr7,0x10000988 <main+904>
> 0x0000000010000aac <+1196>: li r3,1
> 0x0000000010000ab0 <+1200>: b 0x10000998 <main+920>
> 0x0000000010000ab4 <+1204>: bl 0x100005f0 <_init+176>
> => 0x0000000010000ab8 <+1208>: ld r2,24(r1)
> 0x0000000010000abc <+1212>: .long 0x0
> 0x0000000010000ac0 <+1216>: .long 0x1000000
> 0x0000000010000ac4 <+1220>: .long 0x1280
Alright, so the last 8 bytes of buffer and digest differ. I'll unwind this
tomorrow. Thanks!
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list