[Bug testsuite/63175] [4.9/5 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-bb-slp-9a.c scan-tree-dump-times slp2" basic block vectorized using SLP" 1

[rguenther at suse dot de]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63175

--- Comment #23 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> ---
On March 2, 2015 7:13:25 PM CET, "msebor at gcc dot gnu.org"
<gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63175
>
>--- Comment #22 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
>(In reply to rguenther@suse.de from comment #21)
>> >g:
>> >    .quad    .L.g,.TOC.@tocbase
>> >    .previous
>> >    .type    g, @function
>> >.L.g:
>> >    addis 9,2,.LC1@toc@ha
>> >    addis 10,2,.LC0@toc@ha
>> >    addi 9,9,.LC1@toc@l
>> >    lxvw4x 32,0,9
>> >    ld 9,.LC0@toc@l(10)
>> >    li 10,4
>> >    stxvw4x 32,9,10
>> 
>> But isn't this simply wrong-code?!
>
>I don't see anything wrong with it.  The load seems straightforward
>enough and,
>AFAICS, the store code matches the stxvw4x example in the PowerISA 2.07
>reference (in Storing an Unaligned Quadword to Big-Endian Storage on
>page 360).
> r9 is the address of B and r10 is the byte offset of B[1] from B.

Ah, i only tested with altivec as noted in the bug description. I'll check with
vsx tomorrow.