[Bug middle-end/44982] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] ICE in get_narrower, at tree.c:7832

[tbsaunde at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44982

--- Comment #12 from tbsaunde at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to rguenther@suse.de from comment #11)
> On Thu, 15 Jan 2015, tbsaunde at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> 
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44982
> > 
> > tbsaunde at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
> > 
> >            What    |Removed                     |Added
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >                  CC|                            |tbsaunde at gcc dot gnu.org
> > 
> > --- Comment #10 from tbsaunde at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> > > Confirmed.
> > 
> > hm, wfm, but it looks like the patch in comment 3 wasn't applied.  Is there
> > something to do here?
> 
> Not sure if it was posted or tested - so maybe just do a bootstrap & 
> regtest with all languages and if that succeeds the patch  (with the
> testcase) is preapproved.

there is at least a large number of c++ test cases that fail with the patch. 
They all seem to be what you'd expect a file has errors before the new check,
and more errors or warnings are expected to be emitted after the new check.  It
seems like some part of this setup is crazy, but I'm not really sure what to do
about it at this point.