[Bug tree-optimization/64326] [5 Regression] ICE at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in check_probability, at basic-block.h:581

[tbsaunde at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64326

--- Comment #5 from tbsaunde at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #4)
> make_forwarder_block is definitely wrong on not capping. But I do not see
> how vectorizing can get us to a frequncy over FREQ_MAX? So probably some
> earlier bug in there too

ok, I'll send a patch adding capping to make_forwarder_block.  That's enough to
make the testcase not ICE for me, do we care about trying to find the other bug
assuming there is one? or does it make more sense to just hope it goes away
when more frequency stuff uses sreal?