[Bug tree-optimization/68835] [5/6 Regression] ICE in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:387, with __int128 bit field

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68835

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
> (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #4)
> > Because in set_value_range_to_nonnegative the type is <unnamed-unsigned:96>
> > and its TYPE_MAX_VALUE is -1.  Huh?
> 
> I think that's just a lack of debug printing being able to handle 96 bit
> constants.

Which might be a bug in wide-int tree_int_cst_lt.  Needs further investigation.