[Bug fortran/66311] [5/6 Regression] Problems with some integer(16) values
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Tue Aug 4 18:13:00 GMT 2015
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66311
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #12 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 36128
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36128&action=edit
Alternative patch
Here's an alternative patch. I haven't yet tested it beyond
an expanded version of the testcase, but I think it's easier
to follow if we separate the "val != valres" and "need an extra
zero block" logic.
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list