[Bug fortran/66311] [5/6 Regression] Problems with some integer(16) values

rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Tue Aug 4 18:13:00 GMT 2015


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66311

rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
           Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org      |rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #12 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 36128
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36128&action=edit
Alternative patch

Here's an alternative patch. I haven't yet tested it beyond
an expanded version of the testcase, but I think it's easier
to follow if we separate the "val != valres" and "need an extra
zero block" logic.



More information about the Gcc-bugs mailing list