[Bug target/65697] __atomic memory barriers not strong enough for __sync builtins

mwahab at gcc dot gnu.org gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Mon Apr 20 13:42:00 GMT 2015


--- Comment #40 from mwahab at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Andrew Macleod from comment #25)

> Documentation needs updating for sure... The rules have changed under us
> since originally SEQ_CST and sync were intended to be the same thing...
> Guess I shouldn't have tied our horse to the C++11 cart :-)

I've submitted a patch to try to update the __atomics documentation:

More information about the Gcc-bugs mailing list