[Bug tree-optimization/65802] [6 Regression] ICE in redirect_eh_edge_1, at tree-eh.c:2335
vries at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Sun Apr 19 21:30:00 GMT 2015
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65802
--- Comment #4 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The assert triggering is:
...
(gdb)
#5 0x00000000011325fe in redirect_eh_edge_1 (edge_in=0x7ffff64af4d0,
new_bb=0x7ffff64ae4e0, change_region=true) at src/gcc/tree-eh.c:2335
2335 gcc_assert (lookup_stmt_eh_lp (throw_stmt) == old_lp_nr);
...
Indeed the comparison fails:
...
(gdb) p old_lp_nr
$1 = 1
(gdb) p lookup_stmt_eh_lp (throw_stmt)
$2 = 0
...
And lookup_stmt_eh_lp (throw_stmt) is 0, because throw_stmt is NULL, which
presumably is not intended to be NULL here:
...
(gdb) p throw_stmt
$3 = (gimple) 0x0
...
throw_stmt is initialized here:
...
2334 throw_stmt = last_stmt (edge_in->src);
...
In fact edge_in->src is an empty bb:
...
(gdb) call debug_bb (edge_in->src)
;; basic block 15, loop depth 0, count 0, freq 0, maybe hot
;; prev block 14, next block 3, flags: (NEW)
;; pred: 14 (FALLTHRU)
;; succ: 7 (EH)
;; 3 (FALLTHRU)
...
Before pass_lower_vaarg, we have this definition in bb2 definining for _6:
...
;; basic block 2, loop depth 0, count 0, freq 0, maybe hot
;; prev block 0, next block 3, flags: (NEW, REACHABLE)
;; pred: ENTRY (FALLTHRU)
[LP 1] # .MEM_5 = VDEF <.MEM_4(D)>
# USE = anything
# CLB = anything
_6 = VA_ARG (&cD.2333, 0B);
;; succ: 7 (EH)
;; 3 (FALLTHRU)
...
After pass_lower_vaarg, it's spread over several basic blocks:
...
;; basic block 2, loop depth 0, count 0, freq 0, maybe hot
;; prev block 0, next block 11, flags: (NEW, REACHABLE)
;; pred: ENTRY (FALLTHRU)
;; succ: 11 [100.0%] (FALLTHRU)
;; basic block 11, loop depth 0, count 0, freq 0, maybe hot
;; prev block 2, next block 12, flags: (NEW)
;; pred: 2 [100.0%] (FALLTHRU)
# VUSE <.MEM_4(D)>
_22 = cD.2333.gp_offsetD.5;
if (_22 >= 48)
goto <bb 13> (<L6>);
else
goto <bb 12> (<L5>);
;; succ: 13 (TRUE_VALUE)
;; 12 (FALSE_VALUE)
;; basic block 12, loop depth 0, count 0, freq 0, maybe hot
;; prev block 11, next block 13, flags: (NEW)
;; pred: 11 (FALSE_VALUE)
<L5>:
# VUSE <.MEM_4(D)>
_23 = cD.2333.reg_save_areaD.8;
# VUSE <.MEM_4(D)>
_24 = cD.2333.gp_offsetD.5;
_25 = (sizetype) _24;
addr.1_26 = _23 + _25;
# VUSE <.MEM_4(D)>
_27 = cD.2333.gp_offsetD.5;
_28 = _27 + 8;
# .MEM_29 = VDEF <.MEM_4(D)>
cD.2333.gp_offsetD.5 = _28;
goto <bb 14> (<L7>);
;; succ: 14 (FALLTHRU)
;; basic block 13, loop depth 0, count 0, freq 0, maybe hot
;; prev block 12, next block 14, flags: (NEW)
;; pred: 11 (TRUE_VALUE)
<L6>:
# VUSE <.MEM_4(D)>
_30 = cD.2333.overflow_arg_areaD.7;
addr.1_31 = _30;
_32 = _30 + 8;
# .MEM_33 = VDEF <.MEM_4(D)>
cD.2333.overflow_arg_areaD.7 = _32;
;; succ: 14 (FALLTHRU)
;; basic block 14, loop depth 0, count 0, freq 0, maybe hot
;; prev block 13, next block 15, flags: (NEW)
;; pred: 12 (FALLTHRU)
;; 13 (FALLTHRU)
# .MEM_20 = PHI <.MEM_29(12), .MEM_33(13)>
# addr.1_21 = PHI <addr.1_26(12), addr.1_31(13)>
<L7>:
# VUSE <.MEM_20>
_6 = MEM[(intD.9 * * {ref-all})addr.1_21];
;; succ: 15 (FALLTHRU)
;; basic block 15, loop depth 0, count 0, freq 0, maybe hot
;; prev block 14, next block 3, flags: (NEW)
;; pred: 14 (FALLTHRU)
;; succ: 7 (EH)
;; 3 (FALLTHRU)
...
Before the expansion, the ifn_va_arg is the statement that could throw:
...
(gdb) call debug_bb_n (2)
;; basic block 2, loop depth 0, count 0, freq 0, maybe hot
;; prev block 0, next block 3, flags: (NEW, REACHABLE)
;; pred: ENTRY (FALLTHRU)
[LP 1] # .MEM_5 = VDEF <.MEM_4(D)>
# USE = anything
# CLB = anything
_6 = VA_ARG (&cD.2333, 0B);
;; succ: 7 (EH)
;; 3 (FALLTHRU)
$1 = (basic_block_def *) 0x7ffff64ae270
(gdb) call stmt_could_throw_p ( last_stmt ($1 ) )
$3 = true
...
But the last statement before bb15 cannot throw:
...
(gdb) call debug_bb_n (14)
;; basic block 14, loop depth 0, count 0, freq 0, maybe hot
;; prev block 13, next block 15, flags: (NEW)
;; pred: 12 (FALLTHRU)
;; 13 (FALLTHRU)
# .MEM_20 = PHI <.MEM_29(12), .MEM_33(13)>
# addr.1_21 = PHI <addr.1_26(12), addr.1_31(13)>
<L7>:
# VUSE <.MEM_20>
_6 = MEM[(intD.9 * * {ref-all})addr.1_21];
;; succ: 15 (FALLTHRU)
$4 = (basic_block_def *) 0x7ffff64aea90
(gdb) call stmt_could_throw_p ( last_stmt ($4 ) )
$5 = false
...
So it does not seem to be just a question of removing the last empty bb.
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list