[Bug c/63307] [4.9/5 Regression] Cilk+ breaks -fcompare-debug bootstrap
izamyatin at gmail dot com
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Tue Sep 30 13:21:00 GMT 2014
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63307
--- Comment #3 from Igor Zamyatin <izamyatin at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
>
> > + vec_arglist.release();
>
> Formatting. You could use auto_vec, perhaps with some stack allocated
> initial buffer if you think say 16 vector elements would be typically enough.
Is it ok to have auto_vec declaration outside the routine?
>
> Also, what about all the remaining 3 callbacks that create or may create
> decls and have the same problem? for_local_cb, wrapper_local_cb and
> declare_one_free_variable.
These are callbacks that seem to be safe in the sense of random ordering -
perform some 1 to 1 mapping
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list