[Bug tree-optimization/63302] [4.9 Regression] Code with 64-bit long long constants is miscompiled on 32-bit host
dave.anglin at bell dot net
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Fri Sep 26 22:39:00 GMT 2014
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63302
--- Comment #5 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 26-Sep-14, at 3:46 PM, law at redhat dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63302
>
> --- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> ---
> Have you tried with the current 4.9.2 bits? I get the following
> with a 32bit
> host cross to hppa64-unknown-linux-gnu:
The wrong code is actually generated by the native 32-bit hppa-unknown-
linux-gnu compiler.
This results in the hppa64-unknown-linux-gnu cross compiler being
miscompiled and incorrect
ldil instructions in its output. The hppa64-unknown-linux-gnu cross
compiler correctly compiles
the test case.
In my regression search, I got wrong code with r215536 from the 4.9
branch. Then,
I switched to checking trunk. I just checked r215649 from 4.9 branch
and still get the following
incorrect code for the testcase:
extru %r26,31,11,%r28
comiclr,<> 0,%r28,%r28
ldi 1,%r28
bv,n %r0(%r2)
Note that this is 32-bit code.
Dave
--
John David Anglin dave.anglin@bell.net
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list