[Bug tree-optimization/63659] New: wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
su at cs dot ucdavis.edu
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Mon Oct 27 16:43:00 GMT 2014
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63659
Bug ID: 63659
Summary: wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: su at cs dot ucdavis.edu
The current gcc trunk (as well as 4.8.x and 4.9.x) miscompiles the following
code on x86_64-linux at -O2 and -O3 in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes.
This is a regression from 4.7.x.
$ gcc-trunk -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc-trunk
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local/gcc-trunk/libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/5.0.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-trunk/configure --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk
--enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 5.0.0 20141025 (experimental) [trunk revision 216691] (GCC)
$ gcc-trunk -Os small.c; a.out
$ gcc-4.7 -O2 small.c; a.out
$
$ gcc-trunk -O2 small.c
$ ./a.out
Aborted (core dumped)
$
------------------------------
int a, b, c, *d = &b, g, h, i;
unsigned char e;
char f;
int
main ()
{
for (; a;)
{
for (a = 0; a; a++)
for (; c; c++)
;
if (i)
break;
}
char j = c, k = -1, l;
l = g = j >> h;
f = l == 0 ? k : k % l;
e = 0 ? 0 : f;
*d = e;
if (b != 255)
__builtin_abort ();
return 0;
}
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list